Thursday, 26 July 2012

Eftpos designing online PIN-based payment service


Eftpos is hoping to grab a share of the domestic internet shopping transactions with a new PIN-based online payment service.

The company is working on a version of its conventional PIN-secured debit card payment system for online purchases.

Eftpos has not revealed details of the service, but managing director Bruce Mansfield said in a speech he gave at a digital payments conference in Sydney last week that the payment product was "well advanced".

"It's a bit premature, but there's a need for Eftpos to consider card-not-present (transaction) and the internet, but it needs to meet our existing safety and security standards around Eftpos," Mr Mansfield said.

The company, however, hasn't quite figured out how it will achieve that.

"We're investigating a number of options. Consumer research gives us some indications of what consumers and merchants would prefer but we're still working on that," Mr Mansfield said.
The new system would give consumers an alternative to using services like PayPal and major credit card providers.

Mr Mansfield believes the service would still be lucrative if it were limited to domestic transactions, which he said accounted for 75 per cent of Australian online payments.
Mr Mansfield said: "We may decide not to go into international online payments at all, significantly reducing the risk of fraud in a walled garden."

A report by the Productivity Commission from November last year found that online retailing represented 6 per cent of the total $12.6 billion in retail sales.

Online sales are also projected to grow by 10-15 per cent a year over the next three years.
Eftpos is also planning a major software upgrade for point-of-sale terminals that will help it introduce chipped cards. The new cards will let the company challenge the credit card providers in contactless payments. Eftpos expects to issue the new cards from next year.

Olympic sponsors? Which Olympic sponsors?


Over 50% of consumers in the UK are not able to identify at least one sponsor of the Olympic with absolute certainty, new figures show.

Third City, the agency, and ICM, the survey firm, asked 2,013 adults to tell them which brand owners were officially linked with the Games, a group including Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble and Visa.

In all, 24% of respondents could not think of a single corporation boasting this status, and 33% were willing to guess, but without being sure their answer would be correct.

Totals improved in London, which is hosting the Games, as some 80% of participants from the UK's capital recalled one or more of the 14 main sponsors.

"Advertising that offers no promise, support or reason-to-believe looks like wallpaper," Mark Lowe, founding partner at Third City, told Marketing, the trade magazine.

"Unfortunately, too many Olympic sponsorships fall into this category," he added. "Just 'badging' a major event, no matter how high profile, just isn't enough anymore."

A separate study released by Research Now, the insights provider, based on data from 7,200 people in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the UK and US found similar uncertainty existed internationally.

For example, 67% of the French panel and 60% of their American counterparts wrongly suggested Nike was a sponsor of the competition. Another 49% of French shoppers incorrectly gave Evian this role.

In the UK, 21% of contributors thought Red Bull had paid to be affiliated with the Games, while 14% named Google and Microsoft, despite the fact neither firm is formally involved.

Elsewhere, 46% of the UK sample stated there was "no connection" between McDonald's and the Games, reaching 21% in the US. Scores here stood at 28% and 21% for Coca-Cola respectively.

Moreover, 62% of individuals questioned worldwide agreed they would not be interested in buying products from any of the organisations sponsoring the Olympics.

PM called upon to stop cozying up to media owners


A prominent media commentator has called on Prime Minister Julia Gillard to stop conducting private negotiations with media owners, following news of a letter discussing compromises to her stance on press regulation.

Cox Media principal Peter Cox has come out swinging against Gillard's interactions with media owners, and has argued she should be discussing issues about media regulation in a public policy statement rather than in private correspondence with media bosses.

It was reported yesterday in The Australian that Gillard had written to the chief executives of seven media companies, saying that she was willing to compromise on the issue of media regulation. The letter indicated the Labor Government might be open to discussing stronger forms of self-regulation, rather than imposing a new regulatory body, as suggested by the Finkelstein inquiry.

This followed a letter sent to Gillard by prominent media bosses at the beginning of the month, urging her to hold back her push for stricter media controls.

While Cox argued that certain areas of media regulation need to be tightened, he criticised Gillard for her approach.

“She should be having these discussions in public, not through private letters to media bosses, not through a letter to the people with a commercial interest,” Cox said. “Gillard should be making a public policy statement.”

“I agree there should be stricter self-regulation, and it is certainly in the media companies' interests to compromise with the government. But this letter shows the government succumbed to pressure from media owners. She received a letter and she gave in to the pressure.

“This has always been a problem.m Think back to when Packer or Murdoch could make a phone call and negotiate directly with the Prime Minister.

“All these issues, particularly those to do with the media and public interest, should occur in public, so people can be involved in the discussion. Media owners should be part of the discussion, not the only people having the conversation.”

The original letter sent to Gillard was signed by Nine Entertainment's David Gyngell, Seven West Media's Don Voelte, AAP's Bruce Davidson, APN's Brett Chenoweth, News Limited's Kim Williams, Foxtel's Richard Freudenstein, and Sky News's Angelos Frangopolous.

However, notably absent from the list were Fairfax chief Greg Hywood and Ten boss James Warburton.

Struggling TV networks offer cut-price ads

Commercial television networks are slashing their advertising prices in a bid to sell vacant space in the stalling market.

While Seven and Ten networks have budgeted for a weak Olympics quarter, Nine Network is struggling to make ends meet, not selling enough ad space to cover the millions of dollars it paid for the rights to air the London 2012 Olympics. Nine and Foxtel split the $100m bill to win those rights.

The free-to-air networks are reportedly resorting to offering special advertising deals to try to sell last-minute ad space.

Sebastian Rennie, head of trading at MEC Australia, told B&T: “There are definitely deals being done in the market, driven predominantly by the fact that the Olympics are on. The two non-Olympics networks have been open to trading beyond normal market circumstances for the Olympics period – but there is no surprise there.

“The market has been fairly soft all year. The basic issue is that there has been a real lack of visibility. That makes putting a long-term sales policy in place very difficult.”

Another media buyer told B&T: “We are coming across reductions in prices for TV advertising. The networks have been struggling to get advertisers on board. Advertisers are looking to spend money differently, wanting more return on their investment, so pulling back from TV and spending it on digital instead.”

Seven Network has prepared itself for a tough time during the Olympics.

 “There is no question that the market is backing up,” Kurt Burnette, director of sales at Seven, told B&T. “To what degree, we’re unsure at this point. But we wouldn’t say it’s approaching disaster levels. The Olympics quarter is generally expected to be down.

“We set our rate cards based on where we think the audience is going to be and in preparation for the Olympics, so that means we do not have to severely reduce our rate position.”

Ten Network’s ad market share for the first half of 2012 is down by 14% compared to January to June 2011, based on SMI data. The network’s market share is currently 25.5%.

Ten is offering cut-price advertising space to try to claw back some dollars. A spokesman for Ten said in the Australian Financial Review: “There is some discounting, which isn’t unusual in such a market, but no-one’s discounting any more than anyone else.”

And, as reported in The Australian, Peter Wilshire, Nine’s group sales and marketing director, said: “We’re looking to the advertisers to allocate any late money in a short market, no question about that – that’s our job... The story is the economy. Business is doing it tough and they’re being discretionary in their ad spend attitude when navigating through a period with an extraordinary event like London.” 

Social games pioneer Zynga to buy the farm?


Weak second-quarter financial results and worse expectations for the rest of the year sent Zynga’s already faltering stock down in late trading Wednesday by more than a third, to $3.18 a share.

The unexpected news was seen as boding ill for Facebook, which is closely tied to Zynga and will issue its first earnings report as a public company on Thursday. Facebook shares fell 8 percent in late trading.

For Zynga, a Silicon Valley darling whose public offering last December seemed to herald a wave of tech success, just about everything went wrong at once.

A brief list: Facebook made changes to its gaming platform that hampered Zynga regulars. A critical new game, the Ville, was delayed. Another new game, Mafia Wars II, just was not very good, executives conceded. The heavily hyped Draw Something, acquired in March, proved more fad than enduring classic. Some old standbys also lost some appeal.

“Facebook made a number of changes in the quarter,” John Schappert, chief operating officer, said in a conference call with analysts. “These changes favored new games. Our users did not remain as engaged and did not come back as often.”

Revenue for the second quarter was $332 million, below analysts’ expectations of $343 million. And the company lost $22.8 million, or 3 cents a share in the quarter, although excluding one-time items it had a profit of 1 cent a share — still below expectations.

But the real problem was that Zynga slashed the forecast for its bookings — revenue less fees it pays Facebook — to as low as $1.15 billion for 2012, from $1.47 billion.

It was a somewhat contentious conference call. One analyst, Richard Greenfield of BTIG, brought up to Mark Pincus, Zynga’s chief executive, that he had sold stock at $12 a share shortly after the public offering. Mr. Pincus did not directly respond beyond saying “we believe in the opportunity for social gaming and play to be a mass-market activity, as it is already becoming.”

After the call, Mr. Greenfield downgraded Zynga’s stock to neutral from buy in a report titled, “We are sorry and embarrassed by our mistake.”

In an interview, Mr. Greenfield said: “Right now, everything is going wrong for Zynga. In a rapidly changing Internet landscape that is moving to mobile, it’s very hard to have confidence these issues are temporary.”
Most Zynga games are free. The company makes money from a small core of dedicated users who buy virtual goods like tractors in FarmVille. Over the last year, the average daily amount of money Zynga took in from these core users dropped 10 percent even as the overall number of users expanded.

“Zynga’s challenge has been to drive up efforts to keep their attention and broaden their user base — which they did — but now they need to get them to pay,” said Michael Gartenberg of Gartner. “Increasing the number of players doesn’t mean you’re making money off them.”

Mr. Gartenberg added a thought that would bring chills to any Zynga executive: “At the end of the day, though, virtual goods might not be a viable business strategy. People eventually stop spending money in virtual goods and want to spend that money on real goods.”

Zynga and Facebook are tied at the hip. Until recently, Zynga games could be played only on the Facebook platform, and for every dollar that users spent on buying virtual goods, Facebook pocketed 30 cents, its principal moneymaking channel other than advertising.

That partnership has continued. Zynga has seven of the top 10 games on Facebook. In a closely watched experiment, Facebook has started offering advertisements to its users on Zynga.com. It is the first time Facebook has spread ads outside its walls.

Zynga’s efforts to develop its own gaming platform independent of Facebook are still in the early stages. A Facebook spokesman declined to comment.

iPad adoption rate skyrockets in businesses, schools


Mobile marketing is generally built around the need to engage with consumers, but as Apple gains a stronger foothold in enterprise and education, business-to-business marketing opportunities are bubbling to the surface. Driven by its well-known successes in the consumer space with smartphones and tablets, Apple is embracing a natural extension to business channels and education. During its Q2 earnings call, the company revealed how mass-scale adoption rates are beginning to enable a largely untapped segment of marketing and apps.
Apple estimates that the number of iPhones in the Fortune 500 doubled in the past year and the presence of iPads among those companies more than tripled over the same period. It also sold a record number of Macs and iPads to educational institutions, selling twice as many iPads as Macs to schools during the last quarter.

"The adoption rate of iPad in education is something I've never seen from any technology product in history," said Apple CEO Tim Cook. "Usually, education tends to be a fairly conservative institution in terms of buying, or K-12 does, and we're not seeing that at all on the iPad."

Indeed, it's not only schools that are buying iPads; it is Apple's most rapidly adopted product ever. With 84 million iPads sold to date (17 million sold during the last quarter), according to Cook, "It took us more than twice as long to achieve that (number) on iPod and we achieved it in a third less time with the iPhone."

The iPad is a device for the affluent, at least at its current price point, and that makes it a perfect fit for brands that essentially want to reach their peers without all the concerns and limitations of a traditional consumer-facing strategy, said Peggy Anne Salz, founder and chief analyst at mobile research firm MobileGroove. "It's an untapped opportunity for B-to-B marketing."

For Apple, "in addition to owning the space this is coming together at precisely the same time where brands are going to understand the potential of B-to-B marketing… It's almost a perfect storm of variables here," she said. Her latest research for a forthcoming book about mobile marketing has her convinced that B-to-B marketing is an untapped and even vaster opportunity for mobile than business-to-consumer.

Take Patient Shuffle, for example, an iPad game from General Electric Co. that challenges users to run a virtual hospital. Salz recently spoke with GE about the app and learned that with the right mix of B-to-B marketing and entertainment, the company was able to reach doctors and hospital administrators, a large majority of whom already own iPads and iPhone, she said.
"This opens up new opportunities for companies that think, 'we're not consumer facing, this isn't going to work for us,' " Salz added.

Of the nearly 1 million iPads Apple sold in the U.S. education market last quarter, the company highlighted one large-scale purchase at the Mansfield Independent School District in Texas, which bought 11,000 iPads to distribute this coming fall to every Mansfield High School student and teacher under the district's Power Up initiative.

"Some teachers will use a flipped-classroom concept, putting their lessons and resources online where students can access them anytime with their iPads," said Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer. "As a result, students take responsibility for their own learning and teachers are able to increase their interactions and personalize content."

Oppenheimer also made note of some recent cases of iPad adoption within enterprise. British Airways incorporated thousands of iPads throughout its business for customer support. And homebuilder Dialogue House in Japan is currently building smart homes that will be controlled by iPads, he said.

Apple closed its most recent quarter with a cumulative total of 410 million iOS devices sold to date. Overall, it sold 26 million iPhones, 17 million iPads and 4 million Macs, contributing to $35 billion in revenue and $8.8 billion in net profit. iPhone sales alone accounted for more than 46 percent of all revenue last quarter, or $16.2 billion, and iPad sales jumped 84 percent from the year-ago period.

Despite Apple's envious financial results, it fell short of some Wall Street predictions and is providing a weaker outlook for the current quarter with projected revenue of $34 billion. This has become a seasonal problem for Apple, with rampant speculation and rumors about the widely expected sixth-generation iPhone causing some to hold off on their smartphone purchases for the time being.

"We expect most of this decline to be driven by a fall transition," said Oppenheimer, adding that the company has no plans to announce any new carriers or countries for iPhone distribution in the current quarter. In other words, don't expect the new iPhone to come out until October - at the earliest. "Weekly iPhone sales continue to be impacted by rumors and speculation of new products," he said.

Apple ended the quarter with more than 650,000 apps available on the App Store and 225,000 developed specifically for the iPad. The company has paid $5.5 billion to developers since the App Store first launched.

ACCC receiving up to 45 Carbon Tax related complaints a day

The consumer watchdog has received more than 1260 complaints about price rises under the carbon tax since the regime came into operation at the start of this month.

However ACCC chairman said the complaints were falling off from an average of 63 a day during the first 10 days of the scheme to about 45 a day now.

Mr Sims said the ACCC had issued around 30 businesses with an "educative" or warning letter depending upon their circumstances.

"The majority of contacts to the ACCC have been about general price increases, not specific complaints about carbon price misrepresentation," he said.

This was especially the case with electricity complaints where cost increases reviewed by the ACCC had been of the order expected.

The sectors that continued to record the most complaints are the energy, landfill, refrigerants, and building and construction sectors.

"Many of the complaints and enquiries received arise from confusion between carbon price claims and other price adjustments.

"Even where a business has tried to ensure its representations are clear and accurate, a stray comment from an employee that casually refers to price increases as being carbon related when they are not could result in a complaint to the ACCC ," Mr Sims said.

"Businesses that make a good faith attempt at calculating the effect of the carbon price have nothing to fear from the ACCC. Businesses in general are making an effort to ensure that their staff are aware of the importance of not misleading consumers."

The ACCC has already announced enforcement action with undertakings from two suppliers of solar panels and court enforceable undertakings received from baker Brumby's and refrigerant company Equipserve.

Polaris Solar Pty Ltd and ACT Renewable Energy Pty Ltd: Informal undertakings were accepted from solar panel suppliers, Polaris Solar Pty Ltd and ACT Renewable Energy Pty Ltd, for carbon price claims in advertising leaflets regarding the impact of the carbon price on household electricity prices that the ACCC considered were likely to mislead.

Brumby's: Retail Food Group, owner of Brumby's bakery, gave court enforceable undertakings in relation to comments made by Brumby's to its franchisees in an internal newsletter suggesting that franchisees link retail price increases to the carbon price.

Equipserve: Equipserve Solutions, a refrigeration contractor, offered a court enforceable undertaking in relation to statements made in an email to its customers which attributed the entire amount of an increase in the price of a refrigerant gas to the carbon price when that was not the case.
Further actions are expected to arise from investigations over the next few weeks.